Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed by some people that sate of the art technological improvements in communication are deletorious to physical conversations amongst people. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view point for several reasons
Firstly, social isolation is a negative consequences for some.in today’s era, With the biggest invention of the internet as well as smartphone and emergence of social networking websites, people have tendency to substitute the social relationships with online ones. Obviously, it is common for younsters to chat or meet with each other via facebook or zalo more instead of gathering at coffee shops or restaurants in the meetings
Secondly, people’s social etiquettes is decreasing due to lack of physical exposures or informal ways of transmitting messages. On online platforms, young people tend to make use of emoticons and abbreviation to convey their feelings rather than writing full sentences or making gestures or postures to express their actions. For instance, according to survey with messenger application of facebook, people usually use emoji more than writing messages
Finally, advanced technology in communication probably wreck the nature of friendships. People are interested in making new friends on the internet more while virtual friends are only a minimum degree of reliability and loyalty. Some of them merely looking for oppoturnities to con others out of their pockets. For prime example,in today’s era, many people are easily persuded by a close buddy on internet to transfer an amount of money to the facebook accounts, only later awaring that these are clone ones. This make them become more cautious
In conclusion, I agree that improving technologies in communication have detremetial influeces on face to face conversation such as social isolation , declining social etiquettes and wrecking friendships
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | quang31012004 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 67
- art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate turn their focus on science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage people to take inter 78
- Some people say that econnomic growth is only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop Discuss both views and give your own opinion
- A poor infrastructure hinders under developed countries from progress and modernizing Some people think that this should be the first problem tackled by foreign aid To what extent do you agree with this opinion 67
- Task 1 The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with this view point for several reasons Firstly, social isolation is a negative ...
^^^
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...Firstly, social isolation is a negative consequences for some.in today’s era, With the bigge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng at coffee shops or restaurants in the meetings Secondly, people’s social eti...
^^
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee shops or restaurants in the meetings Secondly, people’s social etiquettes is ...
^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly use emoji more than writing messages Finally, advanced technology in communic...
^^^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... out of their pockets. For prime example,in today’s era, many people are easily per...
^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re cautious In conclusion, I agree that improving technologies in communication ...
^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce conversation such as social isolation , declining social etiquettes and wreckin...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cial etiquettes and wrecking friendships
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57543859649 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10502307114 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6306816048 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.555555556 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227553623615 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882996478074 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616348066631 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12890706891 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436754379482 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.