Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships.Do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, modern technology is increasing. It changes human's life to a great extent. However, somebody is thought that modern communication has detrimental impacts to the society. While I agree with this view through some circumstances, besides I believe that it can bring the human many conveniences and knowledge.
To begin with, the development of the internet was impacted society extremely large. But it makes people seem to live in a fake world. Firstly, children to adults usually hold a smartphone, they are busy with the computer and social networks. There are make them gradually lose emotions. Second, they create many fake relationships on the internet. For example, the young people have exciting games, they add friends and talk with each together but most of these relationships are fake, don't base on the present. Thirdly, if people use the telephone too much during the day, their health will decline.
On the other hand, modern technology changes the life of human. It helps people develop a geographic connection, The distant children can chat with their parents on a phone as facebook, zalo, facetime,... Covit 19 perfectly exemplifies this reason. Epidemic situations make people can not go out, they have to stay home every time. Internet helps them amuse with videos on youtube, chat with friends,... When having problems, we could solve them through advanced equipment, do not go away. Internet as dictionary mobile, we can search anything when we have questions.
In conclusion, I believe modern communication technologies have many benefits for human's life even though there are certain drawbacks to them. So each person must know to use it properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | quang31012004 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree with this view 65
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree with this view 61
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t most of these relationships are fake, dont base on the present. Thirdly, if people...
^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s on a phone as facebook, zalo, facetime,... Covit 19 perfectly exemplifies this r...
^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ith videos on youtube, chat with friends,... When having problems, we could solve ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, third, thirdly, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26765799257 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79844427065 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639405204461 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6825571628 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.85 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.45 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223497867308 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059732240483 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053603388513 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136063614905 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269352813819 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.