Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays, there are many household chores which where previously manual but now those can be finished by using of machines. In my perspective, the merit of these development outweight the demerit.
On the one hand, most of people believe that using machines can make household activities are recommended for using these machines. For example, city people who are busy with their works are relying on their microwave oven and cooker for preparing their food. The oven could be utilized for preparing instant food which can save some time for them. As result, the people who use machines make their life more convenient.
On the other hand, using a machine at home has also disadvantage. Which make some people are unhealthy and lazy. Because, people do all the chores with machine in the other that the people become lazy. For instance, in the past, before the machines came most of chore were done by own themselves and they had get physically active while finishing the works. As result, the people who do chores with machines will be inactive and get fat.
In conclusion, the merit of using these household appliances outweight the demerit because people who use these household appliances will be their life easier and more convenient.
- The proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 89
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...s which where previously manual but now those can be finished by using of machines. In my...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this development' or 'these developments'?
Suggestion: this development; these developments
...chines. In my perspective, the merit of these development outweight the demerit. On the one hand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...utweight the demerit. On the one hand, most of people believe that using machines can make ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'disadvantaged'.
Suggestion: disadvantaged
... hand, using a machine at home has also disadvantage. Which make some people are unhealthy a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ake some people are unhealthy and lazy. Because, people do all the chores with machine ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...ere done by own themselves and they had get physically active while finishing the w...
^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...ere done by own themselves and they had get physically active while finishing the w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49426984558 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6566078871 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176465433774 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708437974065 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058427480332 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12139973935 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427326755235 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.