Mobile phones should be banned in schools. What is your opinion?
These days, using mobile phones is getting more and more popular in daily life. Thus, students can easily own their phones themselves. Some people think that schools should let students use mobile phones, while others argue that mobile phones should be banned. Mobile phones can have a lot of functions for entertainment. In my opinion, however, students should not be allowed to use mobile phones at school.
The first reason why schools should not allow children to use mobile phones is that students can lack personal touch with each other. Once their eyes are glued to the phone screens, they do not care about anything around them, even their friends. Students do not want to talk to their friends during break times as they are busy using their phones, and gradually they may lose social contact with their classmates.
Second, bringing mobile phones to school can lead to dishonesty among students. For instance, students can use their phones to search the answers on the Internet during exam periods. Moreover, students can also share their keys with others by using phones to send messages.
Finally, students should not be allowed to use phones as it can cause distraction. Students do not pay attention to their teachers during study time, but they sneakily use phones to text with their friends or surf the Internet. Many people think that mobile phones can be used as learning tools for students because they can access educational apps, or students can share study materials with their friends in a faster way. However, students can lose concentration while using mobile phones. As a result, it can affect their academic outcomes.
In conclusion, for the above reasons, mobile phones can harm students when students use them in class. Thus, I agree that schools should ban mobile phones because it can cause a lack of personal touch, dishonesty, and distraction among students.
- Mobile phones should be banned in schools What is your opinion 61
- The advantages and disadvantages of the internet 61
- The qualities that make someone admirable 56
- Friends and family bring more happiness than money and possessions How far do you agree with this statement 87
- Write a narrative essay about an interesting place village city you have been to 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05750798722 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34805371867 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498402555911 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0980091691 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9444444444 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269242086178 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128210622495 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112319356711 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197513996901 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1084445231 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.