Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past. What are the main reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development?
Cultural gives us a window to the traditions, rituals and ways of living of a community. Presently, similarity in the cultures is growing as fast as lightening in this contemporary world. In my perception, this trend invites positive outcomes for the societies. Here, I would like to account for reasons and mention this is advantageous before reaching at a reasoned conclusion.
To commence with the reasons, the pivotal role to promote similarity among cultures is played by globalization. To demonstrate, rising social, commercial, political and educational networks among distinct nations...
- People nowadays live longer than they used to What caused this situation Is it a negative or positive development 78
- Nowadays young people have to make the decision about their future career Some people however believe that teachers and parents can make a better choice for their future career Discuss both options and include your opinion with relevant examples from your 72
- Some people say that the government should invest in trains and the subway system to prevent traffic congestion in large cities. Others, however, think it should build wider roads. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. 80
- Individual greed and selfishness has been thebasis of the modern society. Some peoplethink that we must return to the older andmore traditional values of respect for thefamily and the local community in order tocreate a better world to live in. To what ex 95
- Some people think one should stay all their life in the same job, whereas others advocate changing jobs from time to time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1713 1500
No. of Different Words: 186 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.526 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.158 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.235 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.271 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.235 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.283 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 26, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rization. Taking the shiny side of this phenomena into consideration, alikeness...
^^^^
Line 15, column 126, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'weightier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: weightier
...t the benefits of this approach are far more weightier than its drawbacks. Therefore, it can b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72580645161 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28568458696 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.075687058 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.411764706 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22463378494 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066567833059 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513620177206 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125424930246 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734764624631 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.