Nowadays, lifestyle of modern mobs was completely different than the ancestors. Therefore, people believe its positive development towards human society but other argues that it's a negative expansion for youngsters. I will discuss both views in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, the way of living in the cotemporary world is easier than the earlier times due to a sudden invention in technology. With the help of these gadgets mobs can easily communicate each over the long distances and also easily access the necessary information of the studies with internet or email. Secondly, the methods of travelling for souls also change with this. Nowadays, people can easily move around anywhere because the arability is vehicles like. Car, bus, trains etc.
On the other hand, there is no dough living in modern style has its own drawbacks. Firstly, cities are overcrowded and increase the competition between mobs to get a job or a house to live in. Secondly, more pollution in the urban areas than bygone time. High number of number of traffic problem will be seen on the roads which cause air pollution.
To sum up,I would like to say that the way people lived in today have more negative impact on peoples life. However, Living the modern time is more easy and convenient as compare to past.
- Many people say that the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems ? 61
- Some people believe that there is a reduction in air travel in the future. Do you think this trend as positive or negative development? 61
- Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports. Others believe that hard work and practice is more important. Discuss both sides and add your own opinion. 56
- Nowadays, Medical research projects are funded in order to improve medicine and treatment. To help producing effective medication in order to improve health and tackle with variuos disease, in your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by 73
- With the rapid development of communication technology, e.g. smart phones, tablets and other mobile devices, some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...of modern mobs was completely different than the ancestors. Therefore, people believ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rds human society but other argues that its a negative expansion for youngsters. I ...
^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is vehicles like. Car, bus, trains etc. On the other hand, there is no dough liv...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other hand, there is no dough living in modern style has its own drawbacks. Firs...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'number of'.
Suggestion: number of
... the urban areas than bygone time. High number of number of traffic problem will be seen on the roa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on the roads which cause air pollution. To sum up,I would like to say that the w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...ich cause air pollution. To sum up,I would like to say that the way people l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01382488479 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56207936533 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.668202764977 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4441080077 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7142857143 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203308821863 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617958444464 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553706848923 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121633786888 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565827333858 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.