In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
there is a widespread belief that nowadays, thanks to the development of advances in technology and science, food and products from animals are like ly to be made obsolete. As far as I am concerned, although artificial products may be ubiquitous in the market, animals are still vital sources for host of industries and consumers.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that introducing restrictions on using products from animals is paramount importance. From the ethical perspectives, these days, people tend to put forward the arguments that there is no right to kill animals, especially species living in the wilds. They believe that this can be regarded as violation of nature. people also condemn all forms of animal exploitation, animal suffering. In terms of technology, thanks to technological breakthroughs, the number of high-quality artificial products such as synthesised fabric or medicine, which are affordable for most people, can be easily produced for a short period. Furthermore, recently, people tend to follow plant-based diet, the percentage of vegetarians increase significantly. they believe organic food is now safer and healthier than meat. Hence, the role of animals is no longer essential for consumers in recent years
On the other hand, I also believe that animals are still crucial in some aspects in society. Firstly, meat from poultry contains numerous nutrients for consumers. Moreover, food from animals also contribute to the variety of local cuisine in the world, which give strong sense of identity of particular regions. Secondly, host of prosperous and famous companies have to rely on sources of animals. Therefore, they will find difficulty in maximizing profits if their products become neglected and fall by the wayside.
In conclusion, it seems to me that although the appearance of artificial products can bring host of benefits for society, animals are still important sources for host of businesses and individuals.
- In the modern world people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 11
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give you own opinion 84
- Scientists predict that in the future cars will be driven by computers What are the reasons behind this Is it a positive or negative development 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is a widespread belief that nowadays, t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...can be regarded as violation of nature. people also condemn all forms of animal exploi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... of vegetarians increase significantly. they believe organic food is now safer and h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41368078176 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02859435908 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1333767927 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274354004474 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887422908317 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691276950918 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158341646242 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637627507104 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.