Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Although in many countries the financial subsidy for postgraduate research is restricted due to a host of reasons, I do not agree with the idea that governmental investment should only be confined within the boundary of scientific research. Actually, theoretical and humanity research are also important to the the society.
People argue that from the practical perspective, experimental subjects deserve more financial support. It is the scientific research that bring about the cutting-edge technology, which as a consequence lay a foundation for improvement of people's living standard. Taking the biological experiment as an example, the progress of biochemistry will be beneficial for the well-being of people. Therefore, appropriate financial aid is necessary for scientists' further study. In addition, the result of those researches could be profitable in the long run, which will promote the economic development of a country.
However, despite the fact that scientific research has direct influence on the progress of society, financial support should not only be poured into it. This is mainly because theoretical and humanity subjects are also of great significance for a country's development. Firstly, some basic subjects, such as philosophy and maths, offer theoretical basics on engineering and technology. Those subjects should also be emphasised by the governments in order to do further studies. Furthermore, the economic utilisation should not be regarded as the only standard when considering a country's development. Social and humanity subjects should also be taken into consideration. People's cultural quality and moral standard are likely to improve with the development of those domains. As a result, those subjects are also worth subsidies offered by governments.
In conclusion, as other subjects share the same importance as scientific research, financial supports should also be proportionately allocated to them for the sake of developing a well-round society.
- School leavers go travelling or working before they go directly to university. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school rather sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Some people think it is easier for adults to learn practical skills (such as computer skills) by themselves while others believe it is better to learn with a teacher in classroom. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with th 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...humanity research are also important to the the society. People argue that from th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...humanity research are also important to the the society. People argue that from th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78983050847 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24497268785 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0603328189 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355157274285 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111486037056 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827193850925 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24649066679 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584370466105 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.