More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Being overweight has been drawing a public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost could decline fattening foods considerably or not is a controversial issue. I totally agree with the position for the following reasons.
There are several reasons to explain why growing the price can be a good solution to lift people out of being obese. Firstly, the tax instrument is the main culprit of getting to reduce obesity. The reason for this is because the government put the increasing tax on food stores in the sense that all food shops have to rise in charge of products. As a consequence, this spurs an inevitable problem which affects seriously on customer’s demand in buying foods, especially fattening foods. Secondly, thanks to this action which lead to scrutinizing the ingredients for cooking fattening foods is also a productive way to minimize the requirement of people in choosing essential ingredients to cook. This means that being limited to selecting unhealthy products, in which gets people to shape a healthy life.
Nevertheless, other solutions can be implemented as another way to eradicate obesity. First and Foremost, many campaigns which are generated to encourage people taking part in them. It is considered as one of the best solutions to enhance their health and prevent some serious illness these days. Secondly, conducting the training lessons for the workplace or cookers, it is of essence that this could help them promote their performance, realize some detrimental impact of using obese products. To be more specific, they could make a good preparation for the meal with precious nutrients from this handy lesson.
For the reasons and other useful method mentioned above, the increasing price of fattening foods is utmost important is to develop the quality of life and availing some above solutions is also fiercely productive.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 61
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 87
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...ht has been drawing a public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost could decline fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
... to reduce obesity. The reason for this is because the government put the increasing tax o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27152317881 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84434580473 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599337748344 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8241288254 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277649127939 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823733496729 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478889350515 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154882788865 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205600428974 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.