It is apparent that more and more residents have no enough money to spend on spacious accommodations or having outdoor areas. Although there are many disadvantages attributed to this trend, I think that it brings us some positive effects.
On the one hand, residents who dwell in small houses may confront with some problems. In terms of living quality, if living space is too narrow, it may negatively influence on settlers’ health. In a detailed explanation, many researchers nowadays reported that urban residents are easily prone to mental problems such as agitated situations or headaches due to damp and cramped living conditions. Furthermore, as the result of limited living ground, houses in the inner city areas have to divide into multiple occupancy, which leads to many inconveniences in life. For example, people who live in these houses definitively have no privacy and have to share kitchens and even bathrooms.
On the other hand, the popularity of these such houses in the real estate market is high thanks to their advantages. Firstly, in developing countries, mass exodus to the cities has resulted for high population density, which leads to many difficulties for governments to cope with increasing accommodation demand. In order to respond to the demand, many skyscrapers comprising smaller flats have constructed as an effective solution, in which many investors gain more profit. Secondly, these homes are really helpful since everything is prohibitively expensive in huge cities. It is undoubted that the cost of accommodation in metropolises is too exorbitant, and therefore, many households that have limited financial background accept to live in cramped houses but affordable.
In conclusion, in many big cities, traditional houses are gradually superseded by homes with small living space and even no garden or yard. Although people face many drawbacks as living in these cramped accommodation, they help governments to offer adequate accommodations for their residents with an affordable expenditure.
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to teach their parents parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 67
- The charts show the percentage of peple working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46984126984 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08698125404 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7611735043 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.071428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252103155803 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808520796409 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564355130383 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157175091405 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425930920543 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46984126984 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08698125404 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7611735043 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.071428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252103155803 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808520796409 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564355130383 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157175091405 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425930920543 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.