More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news. They get news about the world through the internet. Is this a positive or negative development?
In today’s digital age, people tend to increasingly get news through Internet instead of newspapers or TV channels. While I accept that using Internet-connected devices to read news can bring people several benefits, it still is considered a negative development for numerous reasons.
On the one hand, geting news through Internets can offer people convenient experiences and save money. Initially, people can easy to stay update with current news and affairs all over the world with a tap on the screen, whenever and wherever they want. It is more convenient than other ways as its flexibility, instead of information are just printed on newspapers or on air in TV in particular time in a day. Moreover, people can also save money, especially people who are budget-conscious, by reading news from Internet. For instance, instead of paying money for newspapers everydays, people can read them free when accessing to Wifi or any Internet devices.
On the other hand, Internet also provide several demerits when people use it to get news. Firtsly, in today’s digitial age, increasingly unverified information appears, making people misunderstand about something. In fact, with the availability of Internet, some organizations have posted several wrong information with purpose of undermining government, affects servely to overall country. If people do not have ability of gathering information, they can easy to get the wrong news, affecting their informed decisions. Unlike online news, newspapers and TV programs are more likely trustful as all the sources of information are checked by goverment. Moreover, the tendency of reading news through Internet can make printed news decrease in the amount of production or perhaps cannot maintain in the future, offering disadvantage for older people who do not excel in technology.
In conclusion, Internet can help people stay up-to-date with current affairs across the world in a very convenient way; however, it also offers people several drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 70 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years
- Some people think that children should aim to do their best at whatever they are doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 78
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... can also save money, especially people who are budget-conscious, by reading news from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cannot maintain in the future, offering disadvantage for older people who do not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45659163987 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03795056235 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6069032868 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.214285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372373520559 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141842639777 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682379197737 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236031404808 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922441612859 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.