More people today put their personal and private information online (address, telephone number, credit card number) to do everyday activities such as banking, shopping, and socializing. Is this a positive or negative development?
The transformation to using digital technologies prompts many people to publicize their intimate information. Although there are some dangers that come with this, however, this is a positive development overall.
Admittedly, there are some risks in putting your private information on the Internet. Doing this makes you vulnerable to stalkers, who may use that information to track down your houses without your consent. This is perilous as stalkers are usually psychopaths who may endanger your life over a small dispute. Examples can be seen in the United States where numerous cases have been reported because strangers appear at their houses by a trivial contention. Furthermore, sharing your bank account information could result in a loss of money. Since it would put you at risk of allowing hackers to have access to your accounts and take all the money. However, all of this could be avoided were you to be more cautious and only give your information to trusted sites and friends.
The benefits that come with having all your information on the Internet are substantial. The convenience of online banking, for example, is immeasurable. Most places now only require your phone with your credit card number included to pay your bills. Using this feature may make bringing your purses every time you go out unnecessary, which could save you from losing money due to pickpocketing. Moreover, updating current affairs on social media may help improve your relationship with friends and families, as this fosters discussions and possibly new friendships.
In conclusion, despite the many dangers of exposing all your private information online, the convenience and social interaction they would bring are far more impactful.
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some People Say It Is Possible To Tell A Lot About A Person s Culture From Their Choice Of Clothes 61
- Some say that music plays an important role in society whilst others think it is simply a form of entertainment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about news However others believe that they can learn news more effectively through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world especially among young people Identify the possible causes of this trend and propose some solutions you think would be effective 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33941605839 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84069408125 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5374087528 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166347288497 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602348374648 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329162933153 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107184218623 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169471469569 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.