Most major cities around the world continue to grow at a phenomenal rate due to the massive increase in population. This has led to a general decline in the quality of life in city areas as the environment becomes more crowded and polluted.
Give some reasons why this growth has occurred and suggest some practical solutions to this problem.
The tremendous expansion of the metropolises and the worsening environment in such areas is one of the major dilemmas in the contemporary world. Our classic towns and villages with gardens, trees and playgrounds have turned into ugly concrete jungles which have led to a deterioration in the living standards. This has primarily happened due to mass migration of population to cities for better career options. Establishment of pristine societies and self-reliant suburban systems can improve the situation dramatically.
This urban sprawl could be attributed to several causes. Firstly, the migration of skilled and unskilled workers from rural to modernized societies, seeking for a better job and higher quality of life, have accelerated it. Secondly, city-centric education, healthcare and other amenities have tempted people to move to cities. This colossal movement of population to metro areas have increased the costs while declined the living standard. For instance, more than a thousand people live in one square kilometre in many South Asian cities. When population density increases to such level, it is only natural that the living standard would decrease and pollution would reach to a staggering level.
The government need to find solutions to prevent the deterioration of cities and the living standards of citizens. Firstly, this issue could be resolved by constructing pristine societies where environmental standards can rival what used to be in our cities in retrospect. Then, the states can encourage people to live in towns and rural areas by providing important facilities, such as health coverage and child benefits. Moreover, the development of the suburban area is also essential. That could be achieved by developing schools, social amenities and health care services and setting higher minimum wages in towns and rural areas.
In conclusion, the explosion of profound municipalities kills our future and hope. So we, governments, civil societies and individuals, must tackle this crisis before it aggravates beyond our control.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-16 | Trần Tấn Thịnh | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-16 | Trần Tấn Thịnh | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | minerva | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | stanie calitex | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
- the line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time summarize the information by selecting and r 78
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibilities Discuss 73
- THE ONLY WAY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC IN CITIES TODAY IS BY REDUCING THE NEED FOR PEOPLE TO TRAVEL FROM HOME FOR WORK EDUCATION OR SHOPPING 73
- In the modern world the image photograph or film is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Unemployment remains the biggest challenge to school leavers in most countries How far do you agree with this assessment What other challenges face young people today 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57961783439 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99679328799 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1542478764 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.058823529 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167337096182 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050090830523 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450743728727 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090340062102 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501544666527 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.