Festivals are the representative of traditional culture of any nation. We can understand the history of a culture with the help of festivals. Every individual waits for a long period to enjoy this moment. This proposal proposes an interesting argument on whether maximum individuals aware of the reason of any festival, they just want to enjoy their life during festival vacation. I tend to agree with the notion that now most people want to enjoy their lives by any means. In this essay I will try to provide sound reasoning for my claims.
To begin with, nowadays maximum people are struggling with work life balance. In other words, as the job market becomes more competitive, everyone is busy to save there occupations with hard word and streaching themselves in office. Because of this, whenever they get a chance to take a pause from there worklives, they prefer to enjoy the moments. Be it a festival or national holiday. In addition, although every individual has learnt the reason behind any festival during his/her school life, due to heavy workload most of them do not remember the reasons and just want to live the moment. For instance, I had an avid interest on the Indian mythology and I had learnt those during my acadamic career, now I heardly remember those and I just want to spend my festival vacation with my family. Thus, the increasing work pressures are responsible for individuals memory crisis for festival meaning.
Furthermore, with the help of technology, everything is possible. In other words, people do not bother to remember everything nowadays because, everything is available over the internet. In this era of netizen, everything is possible. Therefore, if a person does not remember the reason behing the cultural festival, he or she can easily find that with the help of Google. For example, whenever I forget the reason behind our traditional festival, just simply googling it, I can find the answer. Hence, most people do not bother to remember everything including festival meanings.
Finally, people live for the future. So, it is not mandatory to understand every historical aspects of everything. History cannot change lives, while future can do. I would like to cite an example. There are 33 crores Gods in India. If I want to understand the reason behind the creation of these God's, my entire life should be devoted for this purpose, which is meaningless. So, I do not want to live for the past, instead of that I want to focus on the future.
To conclude, I want to reiterate my opinion by saying that, because of our surrondings, it is not possible to remember everything and eveything is available over the internet. So everyone should focus on the future and spend quality time, whenever they get the opportunity.
- BUYING THINGS ON THE INTERNET, SUCH AS BOOKS, AIR TICKETS AND GROCERIES, IS BECOMING MORE AND MORE POPULAR.DO THE ADVANTAGES OF SHOPPING IN THIS WAY OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES?GIVE REASONS FOR YOUR ANSWER AND INCLUDE ANY RELEVANT EXAMPLES FROM YOUR OWN KN 56
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind, such as reading and doing word puzzles.Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time.•You should write at least 250 words.•Y 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95278969957 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72915481877 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478540772532 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 749.7 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.688673616 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298627922763 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766110072213 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055459956162 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161167138315 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806428048895 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.