Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some people believe that museums and art galleries should focus on local history and culture rather than international works. While I agree that we should not ignore the importance of other countries’ art and history, I believe that some museums should solely focus on outlining the cultural aspects and artworks of the country.
On the one hand, showing international works of art can bring benefits in some ways. Firstly, it can offer local residents a chance to be exposed to artworks and artifacts from foreign lands and bring them a new vision of the world from historical and cultural aspects. For example, some people have already had several opportunities to learn a lot about their country’s traditions and history. Thus, they show a keen interest to gain knowledge of the culture of other countries that they cannot afford to visit and do not already have knowledge of and these exhibitions can absolutely meet those needs. In addition to this, when exhibitions display the history of a foreign country, they can make a financial contribution to a country’s economy. The concept of the museum in the modern era has changed to a great extent which can bring lots of profit by showing extraordinary masterpieces around the world.
One the other hand, there are several advantages of exhibition rooms: pay attention to local artworks. Artifacts and works of national value should be given priority as they contribute to the conservation of traditional culture and customs. Each culture has its own clothing, music, visual art, storytelling traditions, and many more unique characteristics and there are many minority ethnic groups that are in grave danger of losing their folklore nowadays. To convey these aspects in museums and galleries will help to preserve their folk tradition and the cultural diversity of a nation. Additionally, this action could spark a stronger sense of nationalism. For example, historical objects show residents the periods of glory and decline that their forefathers or predecessors experienced, which increase patriotism and national pride in the locals’ minds.
In conclusion, the primary goal of museums and galleries is to spread knowledge and wander far and wide. Therefore, my suggestion is that local artifacts and works should be prioritized, while those of other nations can still be exhibited but in separate museums and galleries. One does not necessarily diminish the necessity and usefulness of another category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | baokhuyen759 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history in their own country Why is this How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about the 73
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The given diagram gives information about the process of getting a driving license 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29219143577 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90391616536 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539042821159 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6919124687 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.588235294 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319332993258 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899358937067 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640009247979 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187666245201 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567068775612 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.