Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many contend that budgets for vocational training should be prioritized over formal university education. However, I believe that each has their own merits and fitting for different people, hence deserving of equal investment. Thus, I disagree with this notion.
On the one hand, vocational training can be inclusive for all socioeconomics levels, allowing for greater employability for many groups. One of the main reasons can be that practical apprenticeships can allow for direct education of a particular skill set, leveraging those who cannot afford the expenses and time of tertiary pedagogy. This means that those who would otherwise be unemployed due to lacking ability can now enjoy a stable job acquired from those hands-on learning. Another reason for this is that learners of this type of institution can quickly identify their professional weaknesses through their difficulties and failures. As a case in point, during practical training, a student can be quick to recognize their lack in customer service skills; hence, the student can engage in an appropriate course to hone his skill. In short, this can provide higher employability for people from all walks of life.
On the other hand, it can be argued that higher education can allow students to accomplish greater depths in their professions. At a formal institution, students are required to employ greater professional insights during their studies. By having specialized courses, learners are able to more comprehensively navigate through problems as they have had previous rigorous research. As such, they can better analyze and propose optimal solutions over solving them by pure brute force. A second point is that universities can allow students to formalize and foster networks. At a higher pedagogical system, networks comprise those of their peers, those like-minded, and most importantly, key figures in their respective industries. These connections will ameliorate interpersonal and teamwork skills, as well as exposing students to potential opportunities limited exclusively within higher educational environments, giving them a competitive edge in the ever-challenging vying labor force.
In recapitulation, it can be seen that each model will benefit their own appropriate demographics. As such, adequate allocation of investment must be channeled evenly, so as to cultivate the workforce to a common goal: increased efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | chile | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Trang Hạnh | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...of investment must be channeled evenly, so as to cultivate the workforce to a common goa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, so, thus, well, as to, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66301369863 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15749829118 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61095890411 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1799417107 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109563160524 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392253104376 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485287640759 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071993233898 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590372635978 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.