New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
Advanced technology gadgets have revolutionized the way offspring devote their major time. Despite some obvious drawbacks of this trend, I believe that these are outweighed by the benefits.
On the one hand, there are number of major disadvantages when children are exposed to modern technology. The first drawback is people believe that technology has an adverse impact on their health. For example, they spend most their time on playing video games are more likely to suffer from health issues such as obesity and damaged eye-sight. Another negative effect is that possessing high-end equipments increases the people’s isolation. For instance, when they own a smartphone or personal computer. As a result, they seem to communicate less and immerse themselves into their own virtual world instead of real life.
On the other hand, I believe that the positives are more significant than such negatives. Firstly, technological advances have added more options to the range of entertainment sources. They can use these devices to chill out after a hard study day, namely playing video games, listening to music, watching a movie but parental supervision is required to limit the time. Secondly, the advent of social networking sites has made it easier for users to establish and maintain relationship. In other words, Facebook, Tiktok or Instagram now are the places where connect the whole world just through a tiny screen and help people to keep informed about the life of their friends.
In conclusion, I would argue that utilizing development technology brings more benefits than drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34920634921 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77646227353 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674603174603 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6460234194 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19556529036 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592878362254 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634530103697 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119104029552 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808945016783 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.