news editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. what factors do you think influence these decisions? do we become used to bad news? would it be better if more good news was reported?
There is a wildly held myth among people about editing news on tv or radio programs. New editors are believed to be deciding what to broadcast and as a consequence the audience would be used to bad news.
There are some major factors which they consider in order to choose the news to broadcast. The best factor is that a news should get the audience attention in a way that editors want and as a result they can get higher viewers. These days, bad news sells more and violence is more showed in tv. News that are more related to wars, death tolls, accidents are some examples. It absolutely affects audience’s approach and it is plausible to say that they get used to it.
It is better for producers to change their direction and broad cast good news equally to bad ones. And the best option is to report the truth in order to gain a great deal of attention. Because people want to get up-to-date information as soon as possible and at the same time they want the right one. It is not worth to spread gossips and rumors because eventually people do not continue to be the audience.
Editing news should not be a rule in a tv station or even radio. On the contrary it should be the audience’s choice to be exposed to the good or bad news. In result, the news editing should be regulated or even banned if they want to hide the reality and mislead people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | Prooboo | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | cheese.cheese | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | vishal sachdeva | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | Canmed | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-11 | zahra70 | 84 | view |
- The photo attached shows the topic. 11
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 76
- in photo 11
- the idea of having a single career is becoming and old fashioned one. the new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. 73
- The photo attached shows the topic. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41501976285 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46702384001 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513833992095 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7969282301 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7857142857 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340442306116 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118767648161 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934195370371 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206599709308 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755697483518 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 12.4159519038 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.