Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new
medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these
experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to
suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some individuals argue that animal testing is an effective method to generate novel cures to detrimental diseases while others say that it is extremely unethical to implement this abject way. From my perspective, I totally agree with the latter opinion.
On the one hand, animal experiments make a huge contribution to alleviating the rate of death annually. When a new medicine is produced, its effectiveness should be tested before applying for human beings. Therefore, animal testing is one of the most feasible and applicable methods for scientists to determine whether the cure which has just been created is effective or not. By performing this stage, doctors have a tendency to assure that medicines given to clients will not trigger any devastating consequences. Without overhauling the outcome of the new cure, it is likely that human’s lives would be put at risk.
On the other hand, the human race has no rights to pose a fatal threat to animals. They are supposed to live and flourish in a favorable habitat providing these creatures with food sources and freedom to do what they desire. Testing natural species with hazardous chemicals on a regular basis is likely to drive them to the edge of extinction, despoiling the foodchain essential not only to the human but also to other species. Thus, council and national governments have to take measures which tend to cost a considerable amount of money in order to mitigate the shortage in the foodchain that is caused by the human race. As a result, there would be inadequate funds for other domains, especially the medical field, plunging the process of creating new medicines.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that although animal testing is an advantageous choice to ensure the safety of the human, this immoral method should be banned due to its detrimental effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-16 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 89 | view |
- As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it? 11
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places toentertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion 84
- Some people are born to be leaders, while others believe leadership can be learnt.Discuss both views and give opinion 84
- Some people think that governments should give financial support tocreative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artistsshould be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your ownopinion. 78
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a usefuleducational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having anadverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks ofvideo games outweigh the benefits? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... banned due to its detrimental effects.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07213114754 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83178109042 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626229508197 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3762704192 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201640178256 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632624260939 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555865541064 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126429161477 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030763396733 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.