Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Over the past decade,animal testing has become a prevalent and publicly recognized phenomenon. Although this may bring several upsides for humanity, the returns are highly unjustifiable.
On one hand, there is no denying that testing animals benefits mankind. People can avoid some severe threats thanks to lab animals. In practice, before being introduced to the public, drug as well as cosmetic production are initiated on mammals along with primates first to pinpoint potential dangers to people’s usage. What’s more, animals seem to be perceived as stupid and savage so that they should not be treated as non-human persons. Consequently, mankind who have already dominated the world should have the privilege to take advantage of animals.
On the other hand, animal experimentation is morally unacceptable on account of animals’ cognitive capacity and emotional sophistication. Some studies carried out recently show that animals are capable of communicating with their herds, some of them even have complex nervous systems like humans. Take dolphins as a significant example, dolphins communicate mainly by pulsed sounds described as barks, whistles, etc. Some kinds of dolphins even reach the intelligence level of a three-year-old child. Some birds are proven to be able to connect with their neighboring animals. In terms of emotions, polar bears have been observed by several scientists and are confirmed to have thought-out behaviors. In particular, they can display their frustration when they miss out on a kill or even form close relationships with their owners. Besides, with the technological innovations which likely examine directly on cells, the test on the whole body of animals seems to become less effective and time-consuming.
For the reasons mentioned above, it is clearly morally repugnant to mistreat animals by implementing experiments on them. Global scientists should discover more new means of experiments to replace animal testing.
- Some people today believe that the world s increase in population is unsustainable and will eventually lead to a global crisis Other people believe that world population increase is necessary and beneficial as it creates the growth of the world s economy 87
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , animal
Over the past decade,animal testing has become a prevalent and publ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eem to be perceived as stupid and savage so that they should not be treated as no...
^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntage of animals. On the other hand, animal experimentation is morally unacce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, may, so, well, in particular, as well as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64214046823 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05197828062 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655518394649 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0856588966 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2352941176 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2308886408 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702093382035 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597884256844 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137941278901 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581111896877 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.