Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while others think childcare centers provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people state that grandparents are the most suitable to look after their kids. While others argue that professional centers would to take care of their children most efficiently, I personally believe that children would be administered the best by family members.
On the one hand, childcare centers tend to be professional at taking care of children, but they are usually costly and lack of family’s close-knit relationship. Firstly, such centers often afford professional caring techniques. They usually own specific schedules to look after a child, offer the child the necessary skills, and solve the child’s problem appropriately. However, this kind of service are usually expensive and might not be personal due to the huge numbers of kids in the same class. The child is likely to feel the shortage of family’s loving emotions since numerous children are gathered, therefore, impersonality might lead to the lack of administration the child deserves.
On the other hand, I would argue that family members would be the most appropriate nurture for a child as it provide family’s close-knit emotions and sufficient administrations. In fact, a child’s growing requires both basics skills and morality. Close-knit relationships between family members are the most likely to accomplish the task, by the unconditional love and proper personal nurture. Grandparents are also experienced in educating the child’s parents, therefore, they are the most suitable mentors who own necessary skills to nurture the child. However, the age might be a problem as elders are less responsive. For instance, while a child is hungry, elders tend to prepare the food slower, which might upset the child.
Thus, It seems to me that despite the lack of agility, family members are the most appropriate to fulfill family’s relationship for children with adequate techniques, while childcare centers fail to complete it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while others think childcare centers provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your own opinio 67
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important while other people think that a stable job is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52173913043 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13607173353 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518394648829 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1916286225 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223328776449 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821782222758 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726375565527 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16196135229 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595150045411 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.