Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
In contemporary settings, most of the individuals become netizens. Therefore, mostly people prefer to socialize online with others, almost in all sectors, in comparison with, in person. According to my view point, it leads to negative progression and reasons behind this are explained in the paragraphs below
To begin with, there are plenty of reasons which shows negative aspects of social media on youth as well as on children and so on. The first and foremost reason is trickers which are available on these social websites. I'm today's modern era, people become trap in the conspiracy of anothers on online sites. For instance, in business sector, employees organise their presentations or meetings with opposition era on social websites such as Facebook, whatsapp and so on. In this criteria, they share their documents or ideas on video conferences rather than in person. Due to this, they may trap in the intrigue of fake persons. As s result, they may compete with great loss in their business which leads to negative development for that company and also nation to. Because, almost all business sectors pay tax to legal authorities for the funds of their nation. Therefore, indirectly, this also leads to negative progression for a nation to.
In addition, the another factor is their negative aspect on relationships. In contemporary settings, people attract with their peers, relatives and close once on social media sites. Therefore, they prefer to communicate with them by socialize and avoid in person contact. Due to this, their relationship and bonding between two persons become weak and causes misunderstandings in their relationship. For instance, today's modern generation socialize with strangers on social sites and avoid to conversate with their families. Therefore, they attract with others in few days and if, the opposite individual cheat them. Then, this leads to great negative impact on their minds because, they may go in depression and stress dur to that ugly fraud.
To recapitulate, according to my outlook, it is great negative progression to socialize online as compared to, in person because, this shows worse aspects on youngsters as well as on employees to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | citra orwela | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Vinuki | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 84 | view |
- Nowadays young people are admiring media and sports stars even though they do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 81
- The bar chart below shows the sector contribution to India s gross domestic product from 1960to 2000 10
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others think that some information is too important and too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both the views and give your o 73
- Some people think it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature such as novels and poems To what extend do you agree and disagree 77
- Communication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic Some people think this will be the death of grammar and spelling To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is are explained in the paragraphs below To begin with, there are plenty of reaso...
^^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...are available on these social websites. Im todays modern era, people become trap i...
^^
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...uch as Facebook, whatsapp and so on. In this criteria, they share their documents or...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24147727273 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84708278049 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5474469756 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1052631579 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172459790797 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591450330849 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367903271895 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119741103804 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183010900478 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.