Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the modern world, the proliferation of energy demand has led to the introduction of different energy production methods. In many nations, the power generated by the use of environment-friendly techniques is in huge demand. Some people think that such energy is less costly and good for the environment, while others say this type of energy is detrimental to the secure supply of power. This essay will discuss both views and explain why green energy is actually superior.
First of all, there is no doubt that by energy produced by harnessing solar power, wind and water is less expensive and is a clean form of power. Solar systems, windmills and water turbines can be constructed by using less expenditure as compare to refineries. For instance, according to a study done by the environment department of Canada, green energy projects are 15% cheaper in terms of construction than petroleum upgraders. Moreover, such a form of energy generation plants produce minimum emissions and have less impact on climate change. Consequently, global warming can be reduced.
Although clean energy has definite benefits, the number of people still claim this form of energy is less reliable and worry about energy security. As with many other conventional energy generation projects, clean energy production facilities also experience failures and hence energy supply is disrupted. Such facilities require high maintenance and are dependent on weather for continuous operations. Due to the above-mentioned reasons, environmentally friendly energy is sometimes mentioned as harmful to energy security.
In conclusion, I am convinced that the energy produced from clean sources is good for the climate and is relatively inexpensive. This essay discussed both notions and illustrated why green energy is at forefront despite some drawbacks.
- Traditional schooling is out of date, boring and stifles a child’s natural talents, various professionals have pushed for an education revolution. Are there alternatives in the education system? Is traditional education doing more harm than good? 89
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree. 78
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. 84
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views and 60
- Crime is big problem in the world: Many believe nothing can be done to prevent it. To what extend do you agree or disagree. Give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...why green energy is actually superior. First of all, there is no doubt that by ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uently, global warming can be reduced. Although clean energy has definite benef...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntioned as harmful to energy security. In conclusion, I am convinced that the e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47183098592 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09807934307 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7760217075 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252176366981 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905651109171 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686257514179 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170510739117 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599803623468 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.