Nowadays, people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can reduce to reduce the amount of food they throw away.
Currently, a great amount of food is thrown away by humans, which causes a waste of food. There are a lot of factors leading to this phenomenon and solutions need to be proposed to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why people tend to waste too much food. Firstly, because many individuals want to enjoy many distinct types of food, they purchase a huge number of cuisines from restaurants. For exmaple, in some restaurants, young people call a lot of dishes like crab, soup, shrimp,hotpot,… to eat. However, after being full, they cannot consume more, so much food is wasted. Secondly, many people want to preserve food in case of emergency situations. To illustrate, during covid 19 pandemic in Ho Chi Minh city, a lot of inhabitants bought a lot of food and vegetables to preserve due to the isolation policy of the government. People could not eat all of them and day by day, as the expiry date had passed, a great amount of food became inedible.
On the other hand, it is very necessary to have solutions to solve this phenomenon. The first solution is that restaurants and shops need to restrict the amount of food one client can purchase. Therefore, many individuals cannot buy too much and the amount of wasted food is reduced. The second solution is that the governments need to impose heavy tax on the food which is wasted. For instance, Vietnamese government ought to ask consumers to pay 50000 dongs per 1 kilogram of wasted food. Because people do not want to lose money, they have to purchase enough food.
In conclusion, there are many explainations for the wasting food habit of individuals and to tackle this problem, we need to have proper and appropriate solutions.
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- To meet the growing need for food to support an increasing population a country should make use of edible insects as a food source However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but harvesting them will also negatively affect nature What 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rants. For exmaple, in some restaurants, young people call a lot of dishes like c...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hotpot
... a lot of dishes like crab, soup, shrimp,hotpot,… to eat. However, after being full, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lainations for the wasting food habit of individuals and to tackle this problem, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76845637584 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7276265138 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4713181543 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394315032325 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136279353634 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761240991307 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232842662339 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079047311609 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rants. For exmaple, in some restaurants, young people call a lot of dishes like c...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hotpot
... a lot of dishes like crab, soup, shrimp,hotpot,… to eat. However, after being full, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lainations for the wasting food habit of individuals and to tackle this problem, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76845637584 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7276265138 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4713181543 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394315032325 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136279353634 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761240991307 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232842662339 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079047311609 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.