Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
In this day and age, it is often said that practical skills and personalities pale in comparison with formal academic degrees when corporations look for personnel. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, I believe that the mainstream of prioritizing professional diplomas would have an adverse bearing on the buoyancy of the economy.
Most universities commonly provide an interactive learning environment for not only acquiring comprehensive knowledge but also cultivating soft skills for students’ career paths. In this way, a university degree is considered the passport to one’s accomplishment in a specific field. This solid evidence confirms one’s expertise and capacity that empower bachelor’s degree holders to stand a higher chance of being hired by the company. For instance, recruiters may not ensure to scrutinize all the job application details thus they are inclined to give chances for those who have formal diplomas and ignore the rest to save time and less money wasted on determining the worker’s ability by evaluating their performance.
However, I would contend this is a negative development that could do the economic growth a disservice. The sole focus on formal qualifications amongst recruiters will compel numerous school systems to put more emphasis on theoretical knowledge. As a result, graduates would lack hands-on experience and personal essence which are highly needed in the workplace. For instance, negative traits such as dishonesty and shiftlessness can take a heavy toll on the development of any company. Therefore, rich life experience and valuable characteristics should be given equal consideration during the hire of new employees process.
In conclusion, I believe that the tendency of preferring formal qualifications over practical experience in search of employment would do more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62190812721 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20735958998 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664310954064 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.813459603 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246070192027 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739087809476 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529711748234 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140133487573 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501000021088 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.