Nowadays, subjects and lesson contents should be decided by the authorities such as Government. Many people suggest that teachers should make the choice. Discuss both view and give your own opinion?
It is true that education plays a compulsory part of each person, particularly children. While many people believe that study programs are managed by the Government or the Ministry of Education, I would argue that teachers should be responsible for this task.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why the contents of school subjects should be taken place by politicians. First of all, the different fields of knowledge are synthesized by experts who have the high degree, so the contents of textbooks are much more accurate compared to those books are written by teachers who are usually concentrated in the specific fields. Secondly, publishing schoolbooks cost the writers a great deal, and only the Government has enough ability in terms of finance to take place this task. If teachers decide the subjects contents, they will have to spend a lot of time to deal with many steps such as providing the real data, referencing from other experts, and printing leading to overburdening with work. Thus, they will not enhance the level of job performance.
On the other hand, I believe that teachers have the obligation to take part on the lesson contents they are going to teach. To begin with, schoolteachers are directly exposed to students, so they understand what they are realistic to need or how to bring enjoyment to them. For instance, my literature’s teacher had rearranged the position of some lessons in the textbook to help us easily to draw inspiration from interesting topics. In addition, as they have a close contact with children in daily life, they will have clearer ideas than the authorities. As a result, they will not only focus on the parts which are the best ways for students to learn effectively, but also ignore the unnecessary contents which have not broadened their horizons.
In conclusion, although both teachers and politicians are suitable to determine the subjects, it seems to me that it is better for the students’ future if the selection of the topic is decided by the teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-04 | Thao Anh194 | 84 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write a 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007 8 and 2008 9 and the proportion of male qualifiers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and ma 87
- Computers and modems have made it possible for office workers to do much of their work from home instead of working in offices every day Working from home should be encouraged as it is good for workers and employers 87
- Too much emphasis is placed on going university for academic study People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99120234604 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87598224905 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58357771261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6447286594 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7692307692 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155462682695 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530738922956 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570534156404 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963409697528 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034659024822 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.