Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Recently, there has been a new topic of interest, revolving around alarming issues or pessimistic information, which draw in more attention compared to optimistic values. This trend is believed to deteriorate not only unit of people but also the whole community. In my opinion, I partly agree with this viewpoint, as emergencies or negativity play a vital role in everyone’s life
On the one hand, neglecting positive messages can contribute to a heartless society afterward. In fact, toxic content can seriously influence one’s mood, therefore, the more negativity people expose to the more demotivated they become, which can even lead to mental diseases such as depression or eating disorders. Moreover, this type of content can be devastating to individuals’ relationships and faith in other people, gradually drifting the society apart as people are increasingly skeptical about each other
On the other hand, it is of paramount importance for everyone to be acknowledged and aware of the current situation. It is true that every day numerous accidents and crime incidents are recorded, these are bad and pessimistic information but do wonder to people’s life. For example, knowing a route that is frequently on the news with murderers can help an individual to save his or her life. These sources of information despite their negativity can be life-changing when it alerts people of dangerous circumstances and help them make more sensible decisions.
To conclude, it is indeed not an ideal lifestyle to focus too much on negative content but forget that there are still many meaningful stories happening every day. However, I still believe that this development still bring loads of benefits for society since it can act as a deterrence for people from danger or mistake in their daily lives
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | marinaph | 85 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Quynh Duong Doan | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | Nguyễn Huy Hoàng | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | Nguyễn Huy Hoàng | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Dungsky57 | 84 | view |
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 51
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, in fact, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26643598616 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00779031858 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626297577855 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4281610185 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.2 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111113974174 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434060509936 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274038083032 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639979620175 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0097229272101 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.