Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In the new era of technological advantage, the interaction methods between human has moved out of conventional borders. The original interacting ways have shifted themselves to becomes more updated for all kinds of relationship. As I believe, this development brings a lot of advantages for human beings.
Original relationship methods have changed to adapt with technology. Post-pal used to be a common trend of how people making friends in a long distance. This method doesn’t allow instant responses as well as difficulty in transferring images or even videos. Technology makes it easier to this type of relationship by providing immediate video calls as well as messaging services without any expenditures. You have more chances to expanding networks or worldwide friends despite geographical distance. In addition, in-person meeting at workplace is not necessary by the fact that people can take advantages of technology. Virtual meeting platform or even social medias can easily provide such services for companies in need with live video calls. Staying at home to work and updating projects progress are possible due to such advantages.
As I believe, technological development brings a lot of benefits to human life. As mentioned above, working remotely is completely a piece of cake nowadays. A smart device such as mobile phone or laptop can provide everything to accomplish any type of tasks. By this way, it pushes efficiency in workplaces to a new level. Furthermore, technology also increases convenience in daily life. Instant contact makes it easier for people to inform or keep in touch with their relatives and loved ones.
In conclusion, technological development in deed changed the way of how human interacting with each other, especially in term of relationships. Such changes, however, bring more advantages to the world by providing convenience as well as pushing working efficiency.
- It is neither possible nor useful for the government to provide university places for a large proportion of students To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison Instead they should do unpaid work in the community To what extent do you agree 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some universities are offering online courses as an alternative to classes delivered in campus Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, even so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41946308725 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13856712154 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5897080018 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6842105263 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294417932119 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802010558775 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750751627184 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182656705123 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235162771098 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.