Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Our society is more depended on electricity, some people believe, that building atomic power stations is a better solution than other production methods. I agree to reduce energy production from burning coal or waste to alternative methods, however, I don't see fusion energy as the best either better solution. In following essay I will state my opinion and provide examples.

Firstly, production of energy from nuclear sources might look eco-friendly, but, as any other source, waste material is produced, Experts across the world still did not resolve how waste products from nuclear power production might pollute our eco-system. Any country, where atomic energy is produced does not want the waste to be storage in their land and seeking its storage in poor countries, where money are more important than their natural sources. Secondly, in 1986, one of the first nuclear power station in Cernobyl, Ukraine have exploded and polluted with radiation not only Ukraine, but, with strong wind almost all Europe. Radiation spreaded from Cernobyl had serious consequences across Europe, causing body deformations to unborn babies, cancer and many others.

Notwithstanding, current sources such as burning coal or general waste are out of date ways of energy production, however, still in use, I believe that natural sources should be prioritised. Therefore, ecosystem and climate differ worldwide, each country could benefit from it. For example, New Zealand, advantages from their mountains and island shape, when wind produce majority of their energy. Also, in The Unites States of America government used rivers to produce big proportion of energy.

To sum up, I believe that natural sources should be used first and the most in energy production and non-natural sources such as atomic power or coal burning might be used only if natural sources cannot cover energy demand.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...aste to alternative methods, however, I dont see fusion energy as the best either be...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39322033898 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60945620895 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603389830508 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9287417175 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0961741182521 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03246031729 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356262954567 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0616235233866 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239461128755 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.