Nuclear energy is better Choices for meeting increasing demand. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The term global warming other traditional energy is demolished in these days, while nuclear energy is helpful for producing electricity which is used in daily life. I partially agree with this statement, there are many reasons behind this factor such as, cheaper source of energy, best alternative for fossil fuels. I will discuss my views in forthcoming paragraphs.
The main point behind this trend is that it is cheap source of energy because it can be discovered easily from earth and it's small quantity gives large amount of electricity which people can use in their daily lives so it is long lasting and people can fulfill their needs such as electricity. For instance, one gram of uranium enlighten the whole country. Moreover, it is renewable source of energy whereas, traditional sources are exhausted. It would not demolished in future while, coal, petroleum are conventional.
However, to having some advantages it has some disadvantages. It is complicated for disposal. It's raw material emit harmful waves called 'radioactive waves'. which cause many illnesses such as heart problems, cancer and aids. It put bad impact on people's health. Secondly, it is used as weapons for instance, the time of second world war America throw nuclear energy as a bomb on Japan and many people were died from it and nowadays in Japan disable people are borne just because of nuclear power. Therefore, it is harmful for environment and health.
To conclude, I retraite my views by saying that although, many merits are available behind this trend, it has number of demerits such as, it is used as weapon and it is disposed complicated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 90
- People living in 21st century generally have better quality of lives then people born in early centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone Do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives despite warnings many people do not do this what are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take an inter 56
- Some people think that nowadays children have too much freedom Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtially agree with this statement, there are many reasons behind this factor such...
^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...factor such as, cheaper source of energy, best alternative for fossil fuels. I will di...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'demolish'
Suggestion: demolish
...nal sources are exhausted. It would not demolished in future while, coal, petroleum are co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...harmful waves called radioactive waves. which cause many illnesses such as heart prob...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04444444444 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69558395149 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1464984443 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116893543529 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037343516639 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423933677819 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067419614497 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481600296359 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.