As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems.
Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion
With the rapid number of cars growth, road systems are hugely damaged by vehicles, the government spends a huge amount of national spending to solve this problem while others point out that these people use cars, they are expected to cover the costs. In this essay, both sides of the argument will be examined, followed by a personal opinion.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why citizens claim that people should pay the costs instead of the authorities. One reason for this trend could be that if residents have to pay the costs, they would more responsible when driving. As a result, citizens would drive more carefully and prevent any road damage, which contributes to the road becoming better and allows people to avoid accident traffics as well as congestion. Another reason of people should cover the costs could be that this helps discourage people from using private transport for their daily travel. As a result, many people choose public transport instead of driving private cars, which allows the atmosphere to reduce the carbon dioxide that is discharged by cars on a daily basis and it offers people to become healthier and avoid some health troubles such as pneumonia.
On the other hand, I believe that the costs are expected to be paid by the governments. In the first place, annually, the governments have already collected various types of taxes and fees from the citizens. In fact, residents spend a huge amount of money to pay numerous fees such as rent or electricity on a monthly basis, if they have to pay one more fee, which causes them to reduce their living standard and become more anxious. Furthermore, more and more cars sold also leads to an increase in the amount of government tax revenues collected from car manufactories and this money should be invested in road systems.
In conclusion, although Improving the road systems is a social responsibility, I am highly convinced that the road issues are covered by the authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | xiao_alatus | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 73
- Some people think that men and women have various qualities Therefore some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies how does competitiveness affect individuals is it a positive or negative trend 56
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...rgument will be examined, followed by a personal opinion. On the one hand, there are many rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93113772455 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56467317525 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526946107784 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3863877968 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345052633745 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120782498064 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623991105573 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183600975477 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502207024034 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.