old building
The restoration of ancient buildings in metropolitan cities in many parts of the world tends to require a large amount of government budget. This money will create more beneficial effects if it is spent to construct new social houses and public roads. To a certain extent, I agree with this view, while I also believe that there are far more arguments to disagree with it.
Perhaps the main reason why this opinion seems to be reasonable simply because citizens in some countries were faced with housing and traffic congestion problems in recent years. Take an example, in my city and many other big cities, where traffic congestion is a serious issue and poor people would live in the house with poor conditions nowadays. Thus the government should invest more heavily in sectors to tackle urgent problems.
In spite of the arguments above, there are a wide range of reasons why I support this view. The first argument is that preservation old building is the appropriate way to bring benefits to the whole society. In evidence, the old building could show the identity of cities and country which attract tourists from around the world. Therefore, government and citizens could receive more money, if tourism development is based on ancient buildings.
Equally important is that the maintenance of ancient buildings could help the nation to preserve culture and history which are impaired in modern times. To illustrate, every old building, as well as historical sites, always stick to historical events as well as old architectures in that period. Consequence, government, and citizens should have responsibilities to protect and preserve these conventional values, and this helps the younger generation in order to have opportunities to study and improve understanding about ancestors.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to accept this view, there are also persuasive reasons to believe that this idea is unreasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | BoyClazz | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | honganhb2409759 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar more arguments to disagree with it. Perhaps the main reason why this opinion...
^^^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...he house with poor conditions nowadays. Thus the government should invest more heavi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in sectors to tackle urgent problems. In spite of the arguments above, there a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lopment is based on ancient buildings. Equally important is that the maintenanc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ent is based on ancient buildings. Equally important is that the maintenance of an...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mprove understanding about ancestors. In conclusion, although I recognize poss...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26366559486 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85917729435 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59807073955 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3568103205 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203236278093 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719014031327 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109104924213 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106351502403 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111999114804 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.