science and technology
In modern time, the development of science and technology is becoming far more popular in many advanced countries. Individuals believe that too many resources such as money and time have been given to scientific studies. To a certain extent, I wholly disagree with this idea owning to three main reasons that I will explore in this essay below.
From an overall perspective, there are a wide range of reason why I believe that researching scientific is not a waste of money and time. First of all, science could improve people's condition in many aspects of their life. In evidence, the scientist discovered vaccinations to enhance the health of billions of people from over the world as well as electricity which is the foundation to develop all kinds of products nowadays. Thus, if the government give financial support to scientists, they would bring a variety of benefits for the development of human society. Equally important is that scientific research could not only boost economic development but also create profits for the nation. For illustrate, advanced countries namely Germany and Japan spent various money for scientific research in some near decades. Consequence, these nations became the top economies which work based on innovations and scientific breakthroughs. Lastly, science is an idea that the appropriate way in order to solve new challenges of human. Take an example, in my country, where citizens would be faced with several serious issues such as climate change, population, and infections. Therefore, people should give money and time for scientific to analysis to tackle these problems, and this could minimize its effects.
In conclusion, I completely reject this view due to many convincing reasons that I mentioned above.
- study early 78
- In contemporary, more and more individuals in many urban areas have little information about people who live around and lake the sense of community. What cause and solution for this problem ? 78
- pressuring on students 61
- spend more time at family 73
- use modern sources instead of real book 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...s for the development of human society. Equally important is that scientific research c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27142857143 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85449877655 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632142857143 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8666650392 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104897267409 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039838145605 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854026561384 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670864040721 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613823083585 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.