public transport
In modern time, public transport ought to be financed by the authorities in order to make it free for users. To a certain extent, I agree with this view, while I also believe there are far more arguments to disagree with it.
From an overall perspective, this opinion seems to be reasonable simply because free public transport would be an effective way to tackle traffic congestion and the environment nowadays. To illustrate, owning to the availability of free travelling options, more people would stop use cars and motorbikes for saving. Thus, this would be able to reduce the level of traffic jam as well as air pollution that be caused by private vehicles in many crowded cities.
In spite of the arguments above, I also argue against this view for the following reasons. The first argument is that this would increase the burden of the taxpayer. Take an example, in my country, where public transport projects require heavy investment to complete due to the weakness of infrastructure. Therefore, citizens should pay more taxes to compensate for higher funding demand. Then, it would lead to them facing more financial problems. Equally important is that free transport would cause overcrowded problems, if there are a large number of citizen choose public transport to move to work or study every day. Consequence, with impairing quality of service. The government should pay more labor and maintenance cost to run these transport systems sufficiently.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to accept this view, there are also persuasive reasons to believe that this idea is unreasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar more arguments to disagree with it. From an overall perspective, this opinio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivate vehicles in many crowded cities. In spite of the arguments above, I also ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...to them facing more financial problems. Equally important is that free transport would ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ause overcrowded problems, if there are a large number of citizen choose public transport to move...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these transport systems sufficiently. In conclusion, although I recognize poss...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17557251908 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8337477745 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2365454759 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253359941743 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086845966647 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125738042347 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143456619956 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101575589207 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.