Team or group activities can teach more important skills for life than those done alone. To what extend, do you agree or disagree with this statements ?
Some people argue that teamwork or distinct group activities can provide people with more essential abilities than those done independently. To a certain extent, I disagree with this view, while I also believe that there are some arguments to agree with it.
On the one hand, the opinion seems to be unreasonable due to obtaining valuable skills and experience for individuals. In evidence, Self-study would force people not only more independent in thinking to get the decision and working in a complex environment but also learn how to solve the problems by themselves without helping of other people. Thus, people would be able in order to adapt better in modern life as well as change quickly in recent decades.
In spite of the arguments above, I also argue against this tendency owing to two main reasons. To commence with the significant popularity of the teamwork in contemporary society. Take my country as an example, where universities wholly offer group activities as an assignment for students to participate in. Moreover, several companies allow employees to work in team-based to carry out their projects superbly. As a result, the skills which acquire from group activities would make students to have well-prepared for the labor market in the future. Equally important is that group or team activities would provide a wide range of useful abilities. For illustrate, the student could learn about communities to not only enlarge relationships but also learn high qualities with good members. As a consequence, they have a better social life. This helps them to avoid social isolation that becomes common in modern society.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to reject this view, there are also persuasive reasons to believe that this idea is reasonable
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...red for the labor market in the future. Equally important is that group or team activit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24305555556 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85464606342 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.689992964 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264446850149 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074973396303 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586724827302 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142092090675 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928614296995 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.