ex-offenders
In the fact that several individuals who have been in jail become subsequently useful people. Many people believe that ex-offenders are ideal to give a talk to young people about the threat of committing an offense. To a certain extent, I disagree with this view, while I also believe that there are far more arguments to agree with it.
From an overall perspective, there is a simple reason why I believe that this opinion seems to be unreasonable because young people would be faced with serious objection from their parents. In addition, their parents would view that the offenders not only have bad behaviors but also possibly recommit a crime again in the future. In evidence, in Vietnamese culture, parents will prevent their offspring from relationships with bad people especially ex-offenders.
In spite of the arguments above, I also accept this view for the following reasons. To commence with the lessons from ex-offenders, these lessons are more practical and convincing compared to other conventional methods would be provided for young people. To illustrate, the ex-offenders could provide information with their stories about how to overcome the problem and become good people. Thus, young people would not only have a better understanding of consequences crimes not only encourage to distance themselves from social evils. Equally important is that this opinion could create opportunities for ex-offenders to reintegrate in communities. For instance, they could make a contribution to society. This lead moreover people to consider them as good citizens. Consequently, because of the increase in social acceptance of communities, these ex-offenders would set a good example for other offenders to find a way to remake their life.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to reject this view, there are also persuasive reasons to believe that this idea is reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...th bad people especially ex-offenders. In spite of the arguments above, I also ac...
^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... distance themselves from social evils. Equally important is that this opinion could cr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38590604027 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99024170024 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1744533542 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255249975632 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962617244227 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122224584286 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137787784198 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103685998582 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.