The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments
on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some stricter punishments which will deter many drivers from driving dangerously or carelessly on the roads are necessary, but it is not the only way to enhance road safety because there are a lot of effective measures. So, I strongly disagree with the statement.
In my opinion, stricter punishments might have a hugely positive impact on motoring offenders. Firstly, drivers who made a minor mistake during driving their vehicles have to face severe punishments such as heavy fines or driving bans. Secondly, If traffic participants caused serious offenses namely drinking while intoxicated, they will be sent to prison. For example, In the UK, the government has enacted a regulation that receiving prison sentences from 2 to 3 years if you have blood alcohol concentration that exceeds the permitted level.
Additional, having practical measures which reduce dependence on heavy judgment improves traffic road safety. The government should install speed cameras on traffic lights in the cities to make traffic calming. Another beneficial point of this solution is to assist traffic police in overseeing transports. For example, my grandfather was involved in a traffic accident last year, and he did not remember the face of the person who caused the accident. But cameras located nearly accident was filming all the scene and helped polices find the offender.
In conclusion, in order to improve road safety, giving harsher penalties to traffic violators is not enough, a range of road safety measures should accompany those punishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | AmazingA | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Dong Tuyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Giselle Bui | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Giselle Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | linhnganguyen | 67 | view |
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishmentson driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35772357724 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80242617001 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662601626016 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3006648592 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164101228771 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513223400706 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636106562527 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114534592252 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752036565911 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.