The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments
on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For many years, road accidents have caused numerous consequences, with millions of deaths and injuries annually in the whole world. Despite the authority’s regulations that attempt to reduce the impacts, the issue still appears to be serious. Accordingly, many people have suggested that posing stricter fines on people violating the law is the only way to ensure road safety. In my opinion, while punishments are essential to enforce the law, there are other measures that can be taken in order to improve road safety.
On the one hand, it is widely believed that the major cause of accidents on roads is the driving offenses. For example, overspeeding is an popular problem that police officers often have to deal with. Since these actions tend to bring a great deal of risks to the driver as well as the surrounding people, they need stopping promptly. Strict penalties such as fining large amounts of money or banning offenders from driving would significantly decrease the number of incidents, eventually making travelling remarkably safer.
On the other hand, there are many factors which contribute to the commuting accidents. To begin with, the poor conditions of some roads, especially highways, have caused many car crashs and other incidents. Thus, it is also important for the government to upgrade the infrastructure, and put warning signs on the potentially dangerous tracks. Furthermore, the weather can sometimes create some difficulties for drivers, such as the limited eyesight in heavy rains. In such situations, people travelling should be cautious and may reduce their speed, so that the unwanted accidents are avoided.
In conclusion, it is true that driving offenses are the primary threat to travellers; therefore, those behaviours should be strictly punished. Nevertheless, there are other reasons for vehicle crashing, which people need to deal with to ensure the safety when commuting on roads.
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 84
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... offenses. For example, overspeeding is an popular problem that police officers of...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cars'.
Suggestion: many cars
...roads, especially highways, have caused many car crashs and other incidents. Thus, it is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34210526316 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82612887442 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608552631579 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.300548396 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9333333333 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10495087311 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031793858051 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423384635477 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625229226505 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464388361693 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.