The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, traffic accidents are one of the urgent problems in different countries and areas. Many people think that the sole solution to increase safety when participating in traffic is to strictly punish rule-breakers. Although harsh punishments can act as an effective way to deter residents from committing driving offences, I believe that there are some better methods to protect the welfare of road users.
Undeniable, a large number of traffic accidents stem from rule violations such as speeding, drunk driving, or mere ignorance and to deal with these sinners, tight regulations should be applied to prevent inhabitants from sinning traffic laws. For example, VietNam is the country that has about 40% of the sum of traffic accidents related to alcohol in 2019. The Vietnam government, therefore, decided to strengthen traffic law enforcement by growing the fine amount for drunk driving and other offences from the beginning of 2020. As a result, there was a 20% drop in the number of accidents compared to the first two months of 2019.
However, this is not to say that only by using stricter rules can we enhance the safety of our roads. It is true that there are still other effective measures to ensure people's well-being, such as heighten people's awareness through the media about the consequences of committing road offences, or encouraging citizen to use public transport systems like buses or trains. In addition, governments also should invest more money to improve and repair downgraded roads.
In conclusion, punish reckless drivers can be effective but only solve a part of the problem. To achieve the best results, the most effective method may be to combine all the aforementioned ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-12 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the weight of people in a particular country from 1999 to 2009 72
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Some people think that children should start school at a very early age but others believe that chilren should go to school until they are older Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015 80
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e welfare of road users. Undeniable, a large number of traffic accidents stem from rule violat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20938628159 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79656894659 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3019579965 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140003376142 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481665384775 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047066062579 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767657298317 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297590707595 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.