In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of suck a solution?
Concerning the issue of significant taxing of private car owners to solve traffic problems and using the money to improve public transportation, some people do support this matter because of its benefits. However, others have opposite ideas. In this writing, both sides of this debate will be analyzed before reaching any conclusions.
From the one side, a plausible argument of supporters is that the high tax rate will bring many benefits to the whole society in many aspects. First of all, it can be said with certainty that the number of car owners will gradually decrease. This is surely a positive feature because an decrease in the car numbers can be leaded traffic congestion problem would slowly decline. Second of all, a special consideration in thus case is that that air pollution would be reduced and the environment more and more cleaner. This is undoubtedly positive since using the money to improve public transportation can commute fast work more efficient and effective.
From the other side, those who disagree point out that there are a couple of shortcomings. Firstly, one of the disadvantages is thatusing public transport can lead to the extending of inflections, viruses and bacteria. This is a clear limitation because of the space’s public vehicles. Everyone have to stand or have a seat closely to each other so it is easy to inflect diseases. A further handicap may be caused unemployment and hampered the economic growth of the country in the long run. This is obviously negative because the tax will increase the financial burden for car owners so that people who are not in a good financial position but must have a car to travel, to work will suffer. And if they can not afford the tax, they will dispose their cars and lose jobs.
Taking everything into account, for the above reasons, I firmly believe the limitations of critical burdening of private vehicles outweigh its possible benefits. Therefore, I do totally reject taxing private car owners heavily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | astu | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Nguyen051207 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | macanh0811 | view | |
| 2022-12-13 | Ahmad Ilham Zamzami | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 92
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of suck a solution 84
- Traffic and housing problem in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 82
- In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...is is surely a positive feature because an decrease in the car numbers can be lead...
^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
...be reduced and the environment more and more cleaner. This is undoubtedly positive since usi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01506024096 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74684758413 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4560355896 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225932972674 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686351830018 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844140556816 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143965831037 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427652600474 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.