Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in international tourism. Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the issue of global tourism has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that the development of tourism benefits local communities a great deal and should not be discouraged, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that a there are a number of advantages that can be derived from a rise in the tourism industry. Perhaps the principal benefit is that the advancement of the tourism industry invigorates economic growth considering that it attracts investment from governments across the globe and global firms. Furthermore, tourism sectors often create a multitude of employment opportunities in the building of facilities as well as the updating of infrastructure, leading locals to have an improved standard of living. To provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for international tourism, there would be much higher unemployment in a myriad of cities that are renowned amongst overseas visitors. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for several of the arguments in favour of tourism.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that tourism merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that a growth in global tourism poses a threat to the local environment since a myriad of overseas visitors produce a vast deal of waste, exerting a detrimental influence on the quality of local residents' life. As an illustration, one notable cultural heritage site in South Korea had more than 500 species of birds in 2010. However, the majority of them became extinct due to a huge amount of garbage generated by tourists. In addition, some travellers from overseas countries commit vandalism, which places a heavy burden on local governments as they have to spend public money in order to restore facilities. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- X 89
- Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Q11 Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings Discuss both views and gi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...poses a threat to the environment since a large number of travellers generates a great deal of wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...ental influence on the quality of local residents life in local areas. As an illustration...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17158176944 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92293815886 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584450402145 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6254616456 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.470588235 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237423370619 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665024841566 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589008976151 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129405963991 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788083645558 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.