Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parental responsibility towards children and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter parent's responsibility to kids is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that taking parental responsibility can be a plus, and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the responsible parenting can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of parental responsibility and children's successes are inextricably bound up. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientist demonstrates the relationship between the pivotal role of parent and children' upbringing as well as an exponential decrease in juvenile delinquencies. Hence, the beneficial ramifications of parental sovereignty instruction can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, deprivation of proper schooling and literacy might augment the consequence of committing crime by children. Moreover, fundamental aspects of children's upbringing could relate to this reality that demerits of relinquishing responsibility over their children and having recalcitrant children pertain to an upsurge in criminality rate. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of having alcoholic parents is correlated negatively with the aggressive behaviour. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of developing legal doctrine of parental sovereignty.
To conclude, whilst there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having responsible parenting far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantages of parent's responsibility prove the significance of children's upbringing, but also pinpoint improvement of people's habits implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | dan1sland | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | dan1sland | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | gayaclav1973 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Baljinder Singh 1985 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | Jerry Turtle | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08833922261 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5176106077 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636042402827 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2869491039 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.583333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259363547917 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950190332114 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376957728819 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157972287895 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189248304599 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.34 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.