Parents should not allow their children to play football. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is a well-known opinion that parents should forbid their children to play football. Some people consider that playing this game might be dangerous for a child’s health. Others think that there is nothing wrong with playing this famous game. I totally agree with the second opinion, and I truly believe if a child wants to play football, that his parents should allow him to do it.
To begin with, playing football allows a child to train his muscles and to improve his health. To be successful in this game it is important to have strong legs and well-developed lungs. It requires many training hours that allows a child to become more disciplined. For instance, look at Christiano Ronaldo. His perfect body and skills are good examples of how playing football can affect a child’s life.
Further, football allows people to develop the ability to be a good team player. While playing this game, you should concentrate on your team players as well as on competitors, because only playing as a team can get you to the win. I have been playing football since 7 years old, and this experience helps me to communicate with my coworkers in order to achieve the company’s goals effectively.
In conclusion, I consider that football is a great sport game, which can implement a lot of beneficial things in children’s life. For sure, it is important to remember that it is a sport and sometimes it can lead to traumas. However, if you follow rules and always check your health, the probability to get a trauma is almost equal to zero percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should writ 61
- People nowadays sleep less than they did in the past Why is this Do you think it is a negative or positive development 56
- Some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and homeless people Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people think technological devices such as smartphones tablets and mobile phones bring more disadvantages than advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chieve the company’s goals effectively. In conclusion, I consider that football ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83271375465 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68553849802 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6410422641 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323395729828 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962646848793 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889268122824 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177582706414 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885259226322 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chieve the company’s goals effectively. In conclusion, I consider that football ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83271375465 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68553849802 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6410422641 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323395729828 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962646848793 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889268122824 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177582706414 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885259226322 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.