In the past, people store knowledge in the books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the Internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Many years ago, books used to be the most popular method to keep knowledge. However, in this digital era, Internet can replace that role when it can provide people with access to an enormous amount of information. In my opinion, I believe it brings more pros than cons to our society
On the one hand, online knowledge is only accessed through a medium, which may be problematic for some individuals. Specifically, when knowledge is stored online, people must satisfy two essential requirements to get access. First, they need an Internet connection which may not be available for every individual worldwide. Second, in order to access to online knowledge they also need to have specific devices such as smartphones or computers, which can become obstacles when people must pay extra money. As a result, they are some problems associated with storing knowledge on the Internet
On the other hand, online knowlede is way more beneficial compared to the traditional one due to its storage capacity. In detail, books require space to keep as well as their paper quality can be worn out and deteriorate over time. In contrast, online knowledge can exist permanently and do not require as much space as books do. Moreover, Internet can give people the ability to access to an endless amount of knowledge with less time and more accurate. Therefore, although books have been utilized as a source to keep knowledge for a while, Internet can totally overperform them by its amazing and optimal functions
To conclude, the advantages of storing information on the Internet can totally outweigh its drawbacks. As the rate of technical devices ownership and Internet accesiblity increases exponentionally, the issues are eaily handled in the future. Besides, the positivity of having limitless storage capacity without worrying about preservation is extremely impressive
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | MinhGoal1 | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | namanpluck | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | duckymomokhongphailarapper | 87 | view |
| 2022-05-02 | Josie-e3 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | DIEU PHUONG | 76 | view |
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time 61
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980s and 2010s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace e g at home when travelling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...its drawbacks. As the rate of technical devices ownership and Internet accesiblity incr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23745819398 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8576750803 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591973244147 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.258712638 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.461538462 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6923076923 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286836487463 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968447762862 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714605388749 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153841954327 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047927124225 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...its drawbacks. As the rate of technical devices ownership and Internet accesiblity incr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23745819398 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8576750803 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591973244147 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.258712638 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.461538462 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6923076923 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286836487463 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968447762862 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714605388749 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153841954327 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047927124225 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.