As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction.
To what extent do you agree with such a procedure?
In this essay I will be discussing about if it’s ethical to clone humans to harvets organs. I completely refused with such medicalreatments and I will explain in the below paragraphs my view point.
Even though medical science has made a lot of progress over the past few decades, there are some diseases which cannot be fixed by medicine or treatments. For example, kidney or heart failure in most cases would require an implant from a donor. It sounds like an easy option to clone humans to get the replacement body parts, but we have to think about the ethical implication of it. By cloning, we are artificially produce another human being who is same at a DNA level as the patient. Their memories and behaviour characteristics might be different, but they are still a living, breathing human being. Harvesting them for their organs means we will be killing one person for the survival of another which I believe is highly unethical.
Also, cloning is not something they can do overnight. A cloned animal will take the same time to grow up as it's naturally born DNA donor. That is a long time for human. There is some promising research happening with STEM cells, which will enable medical scientists to grow the just the organs in the laboratory.
To conclude, there are many upcoming treatment methods which don't have the moral implications of destroying a life to save another. Also
, cost and duration of cloning will hinder its growth as a credible way of treating diseases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Koi | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | cleee | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | tung0303 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'produced'.
Suggestion: produced
... of it. By cloning, we are artificially produce another human being who is same at a DN...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e many upcoming treatment methods which dont have the moral implications of destroyi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...destroying a life to save another. Also , cost and duration of cloning will hinde...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, for example, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83203125 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70465243917 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5654249951 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098682283534 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359387342684 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0195082735292 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0485520231512 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317120610604 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.