People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?
It is true that nowadays citizens settling down in megacities are prone to various socio- economic obstacles in their daily life such as pollution and overload information. From my perspective, to deal with those obstacles government should encourage people to regional areas.
On the one hand, there are two main problems are threatening the life of people who lived in super cities. Firstly, in the modern world, people are bombarded with advertising campaigns, as they flip through TV channels, touch smartphone screen or just walk in the street, those repeated slogans and attractive logos have planted in their brain. This phenomenon is not restricted to youngsters only but also the elders have become targets of advertising agencies. When exposed to these advertisements, people tend to lose their memory about locally produced counterparts and buy expensive brands without hesitation. Secondly, thank to the state of the art technology, scientists have explored different types of alternative energy sources and applied them in many megacities such as nuclear manufacturers or wind farms. However, besides being renewable and environmentally friendly, they still exist dangerous pitfalls. The disaster at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan, for example, the poisonous and radioactive emissions produced by the explosion not only killed many people, but also left a legacy for cancer deaths for the future.
On the other hand, I suppose that government should impose effective policies which will balance the population in big cities with relevant regions. The first reason is that if the rate of people fall down the burden on natural resources will be shared. As a result, the citizen can use energy produced from both fossil fuel and alternative sources which might contribute to the decline of the number of nuclear reactor. Another reason is that, fewer people living in big cities will reduce the pressure on revenue and enhance the quality of life as a whole. Besides, this amount of money can be invested for other heart-fields such as healthcare or researches finding out new treatments for chronic illness.
In conclusion, dangerous alternative energy sources and a bombardment of advertisement are among the most serious problems facing city residents nowadays, and personally, I think that the authorities should encourage people to relocated to other areas to live.
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015 89
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2007. 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- the diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Portland from 150 to 2007. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 56
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'obstacles'' or 'obstacle's'?
Suggestion: obstacles'; obstacle's
...From my perspective, to deal with those obstacles government should encourage people to r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...hout hesitation. Secondly, thank to the state of the art technology, scientists have explored di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for example, i suppose, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85681112633 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615591397849 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9226146299 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2666666667 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25627338583 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776329045035 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774114379797 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158085702008 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041686751458 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.