People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone. What are the reasons for this trend? Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages?

In this modern era, it is commonly that masses prefer using text messages rather than having conversation on the phone directly. There are several reasons for this interesting topic and I consent to be more disadvantageous side which will be elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph.
To begin with, the tendency of the communities to text by messages rather than phoning might be inflicted by the limitation of time due to numerous of works burden. To illustrate, while the waiters do their works such as serving a costumer, they would be able to communicate with others without disturbing both comfortability of customer and their obligation. Furthermore, if the employees directly phone and make conversation with their boss, they will probably hesitate and make the messy sentence arrangement. The messages text enables to arrange properly the point of what the people intend for.
On the flip side, in my point of view, this issue could bring on demerit such as unbounding relationship especially for spouse. Less of the immersed feeling in terms of how the way they build the communication could leading to the misunderstanding each other, particularly if they have a problem in their family. In addition, the inefficient communication owing to the delayed reply might be the other one. People tend to ignore the someone message and do something else since it is considered something unimportant. Subsequently, the two-way communication is not happened.
To sum up, having less conversation directly by phoning and tend to text by message might be brought on the limitation of time and making an appropriate word. Besides, I concur to be more demerits as it could generate unbounding relationship and inefficient communication due to the delayed reply.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-09 Mollymaul 84 view
2023-02-13 Mollymaul 89 view
2023-01-11 Andi Irwan Nur 70 view
2023-01-10 Mollymaul 89 view
2023-01-10 Andi Irwan Nur 70 view
Essays by user Andi Irwan Nur :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'messages'' or 'message's'?
Suggestion: messages'; message's
...ake the messy sentence arrangement. The messages text enables to arrange properly the po...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he point of what the people intend for. On the flip side, in my point of view, t...
^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... way they build the communication could leading to the misunderstanding each other, par...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: the; someone
...be the other one. People tend to ignore the someone message and do something else since it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24113475177 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14110744933 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556737588652 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2491056476 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256783895701 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891178341526 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733976477265 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159501172775 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658367686502 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.