People now days send text massages more frequently than they talk the phone. What are the reasons for this trend? Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages?
There has been a modern view that the public society increasingly tends using text massages rather than communicating via phone. There are several causes for this phenomenon, however, I personally opine this issue has several drawbacks which I will elaborate more below.
Regarding the causes, the percentage of texting has significantly increased these days, since this is more effective and efficient to send information at any time without interrupting hectic schedules of recipients. Following that, the lexical resources can be selected properly to arrange and deliver its content. Furthermore, to prefer this media of communication may avoid the fear of offending others. Compared to telephoning, this can help callers with different dialects to show good respect and impression through words. In connection with technological development, people often utilise many multilingual translation apps to communicate and set the language contents aimed for the receivers.
On the one side, we must realize the major drawback of a preference for conveying a message is that common societies unlikely reply a response as soon as possible. Needless to say, if a person requires fast response, several will take a phone call. Apparently, many enterpreneurs greatly decide to phone their colleagues in order to establish stronger business relationship. In addition, tone voice and intonation are the prominent features of how to create good impression and introduction. In fact, miscommunication most likely occurs via messages leading to confusion in interpreting the contextual meaning, so that, this might lessen the essence of social interaction.
In conclusion, the causes of preferring text messages amongst today’s society may include both the ease of conveying information and proper-arranged sentences. While, I would argue that delayed response as well as ambiguous text content should be worth considering.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Andi Irwan Nur | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Andi Irwan Nur | 70 | view |
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many societies there is growing emphasis on individualism with people prioritizing their personal goals and desires over collective interest Is this a positive or negative development 78
- People are more mobile nowadays They seldom live in one city all of their lives Why do you think this is happening What are the consequences of this trend 61
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 89
- Providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'messages'?
Suggestion: messages
...c society increasingly tends using text massages rather than communicating via phone. Th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n the essence of social interaction. In conclusion, the causes of preferring te...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72727272727 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19619437259 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6581004217 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177423249399 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050993237968 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436042424522 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10681744726 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513664127688 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.