People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone. What are the reasons for this trend? Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages?
In modern era, the tendency of modern community finds easier way to communicate with each other through texting than calling on a phone. There are several reasons from this tropical issue, however, this issue, personally, I believe would bring considerable demerits which will elucidate more below.
Regarding the causes, the flexible time between the sender and the receiver is one of the main reasons why people prefer communicating on text to calling. In connection with hustle and bustle activities, they could reply their text whenever they stand in leisure time in order that complete understanding of the text content may maintain well-developed communication. Furthermore, delivering message on chat could secure any kinds of personal information delivered which will retain users’ privacy. Industry 5.0 offers the advancement of communication technology which Meta Platforms, Whatsapp Messenger, upgrade the encrypted data in digital written communication to continuously gain the trust of more than 2 billion users.
On the other hand, it seems to me that, the negative side of this could inflict misinterpretation of text message which will erode relationship building. Speaking on the phone could perceive expression and intonation both caller and receiver in which this will build up more attention, even more authoritative during formal occasion. If their conversation on chat seizes complicated understanding, they will clarify faster through verbally telephoning. Moreover, telephoning requires quick response, especially dealing with problem-solving and decision-making. To illustrate, in terms of company’s success to handle a complaint, they prioritise call answering services to put consumers at the heart of a business.
In conclusion, the main factors people preferring to text message is time flexibility and efficiency along with controlling data security. Meanwhile, the demerits of this induce misconception information given both parties and undermine trust in delayed response.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Andi Irwan Nur | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Andi Irwan Nur | 70 | view |
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as sahara desert or Antrarctica What are the benefits and disadvantages of going there 89
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Despite better access to education many adults today still cannot read or write In what ways are they disadvantaged What can governments do to help them 80
- Today the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people Do you agree or disagree 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erits which will elucidate more below. Regarding the causes, the flexible time ...
^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...ime between the sender and the receiver is one of the main reasons why people pref...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89078498294 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2471528571 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6121279887 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.769230769 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228139246824 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724936847856 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448790716835 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137070518128 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196021597912 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erits which will elucidate more below. Regarding the causes, the flexible time ...
^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...ime between the sender and the receiver is one of the main reasons why people pref...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89078498294 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2471528571 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6121279887 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.769230769 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228139246824 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724936847856 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448790716835 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137070518128 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196021597912 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.