The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, numerous news media prefer reporting problems and emergencies to publishing positive developments which will adversely affect individual and general society. I, personally, consent to positive reasons of this issue, which I will elucidate more below.
To begin with, many TV channels such as travelling and culinary news greatly improve economic growth of certain regions. To illustrate, many journalists who explore hidden gem attractions (food and tradition) may captivate tourist arrivals significantly supporting the increase of local revenue. Moreover, viewing a journey of natural disaster recovery could encourage optimism and enthusiasm of the citizen. Take Japan government as an example, instead of showing deep hurt which will inflict traumatic, this nation only shares mitigation, evacuation and how to refurbish infrastructures. This results in public awareness of undertaking self-help effort, prevention and emergency relief.
On the other hand, being conveyed by latest information to society greatly assist ones to take precautions. The fact published by US Embassy and Consulates in Indonesia, the second rank of criminal rates, human traficking in this nation, prompts more awareness of illegal agencies when applying for immigrant workers. In addition, the number of up-to-the-minute news could ensure public transparency which promotes greater accountability from government. A recent pandemic COVID-19 has been accompanied by numerous disinformation incuring the waves of distrust among public. To work with press coverage gaining public response might lower such challenge.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, the preference of reporting and multimedia journalism delivering headlines news and issues are to leverage public awareness of undertaking preventive measures along with promoting open government principles. This is as long as press media informs many supportive news to establish public positivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | Mollymaul | 92 | view |
| 2023-05-11 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-21 | yash0724 | 75 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | gaurav2492 | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-06 | Grammerly Premium | 92 | view |
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 89
- Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Do you agree or disagree 89
- In recent times economic growth has helped many become richer both in developed and developing countries However those in developed countries are not as happy as they were in the past Why is this What can be learned from this 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact with many people Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much supportive news', 'a good deal of supportive news'.
Suggestion: much supportive news; a good deal of supportive news
... This is as long as press media informs many supportive news to establish public positivity.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08363636364 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12326169835 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701818181818 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0036906931 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13057921661 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430122055775 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652792037783 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092966809942 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818280056616 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.81 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.